Milwaukee Bucks vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats: Quickley Leads Toronto’s 122–94 Victory
For one quarter, Milwaukee had reasons to feel confident. The Bucks were ahead, their home crowd had a contest to follow, and Toronto had ground to make up. By the finish, the Raptors had turned that situation into a 122–94 victory at Fiserv Forum on 22 February 2026.
The Milwaukee Bucks vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats show how that change happened. Immanuel Quickley finished with 32 points and nine assists, while Brandon Ingram supplied 22 points and six assists. Milwaukee received 21 points each from Ryan Rollins and Kevin Porter Jr., but Toronto’s wider contribution made the difference. Beyond the leading scorers, the game came down to shooting, passing, bench production and the possessions Milwaukee gave away.
A Bright Milwaukee Start Fades After the Opening Quarter
Milwaukee led 27–22 after the first quarter. It was a useful opening, particularly with Giannis Antetokounmpo unavailable because of a right calf strain.
Toronto also had an important absence. Scottie Barnes missed the game for personal reasons, leaving other players to cover his usual contribution.
The second quarter changed the balance. Toronto scored 38 points to Milwaukee’s 24, turning a five-point deficit into a 60–51 half-time lead. That 14-point swing gave the visitors control of the scoreboard.
Milwaukee briefly threatened to close the gap after the interval. An 8–2 start to the third quarter reduced Toronto’s lead to three, creating an opportunity for the Bucks to recover.
Instead, Toronto answered with ten unanswered points. Quickley and Jamal Shead scored five each during that stretch, pushing Milwaukee back into pursuit.
The Raptors finished the third quarter ahead 92–73. They then won the final period 30–21, completing a game in which their advantage grew steadily after the first quarter.
That sequence matters. The 28-point margin came from repeated winning stretches, with Toronto responding firmly when Milwaukee threatened a comeback.
Toronto Raptors Player Stats: Quickley Had Support Around Him
Quickley delivered the strongest scoring performance of the afternoon. He made 11 of 19 field-goal attempts, including five three-pointers, and finished a perfect five of five at the free-throw line.
His nine assists added another layer to the performance. Toronto received both scoring and creation from its starting guard, without a heavy cost in mistakes: Quickley committed just one turnover.
The main Toronto Raptors box score figures were:
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Field goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immanuel Quickley | 32 | 3 | 9 | 11–19 |
| Brandon Ingram | 22 | 2 | 6 | 8–17 |
| Sandro Mamukelashvili | 15 | 4 | 4 | 6–12 |
| Jamal Shead | 12 | 6 | 6 | 4–9 |
| Ja’Kobe Walter | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3–10 |
| RJ Barrett | 7 | 6 | 3 | 2–10 |
| Jakob Poeltl | 6 | 8 | 2 | 3–4 |
Ingram’s 22 points gave Toronto a dependable second scorer. He also recorded six assists and two blocks, contributing beyond his shooting.
The Milwaukee Bucks vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats become more revealing further down the list. Mamukelashvili provided 15 points, four rebounds and four assists from the bench. Three of his six made shots came from outside the arc.
Shead added 12 points, six rebounds, six assists and two steals. He also finished without a turnover, making his minutes especially productive.
Toronto even had room to absorb a difficult shooting game from Barrett, who made two of ten attempts. His six rebounds and three assists still contributed, while other players supplied the missing points.
That spread of responsibility helped the Raptors maintain their scoring across different line-ups.
Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats: Two Leading Guards, Too Few Consistent Answers
Porter and Rollins finished level on points, although their performances took different shapes.
Porter recorded 21 points and ten assists, making eight of his 11 shots. He also collected three steals and committed only one turnover. In a difficult team result, his shooting and passing were clear positives.
Rollins added 21 points and nine rebounds, falling one rebound short of a double-double. His four three-pointers from seven attempts gave Milwaukee valuable outside scoring.
The key Milwaukee Bucks player statistics were:
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Field goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Rollins | 21 | 9 | 1 | 6–17 |
| Kevin Porter Jr. | 21 | 2 | 10 | 8–11 |
| Cam Thomas | 15 | 3 | 1 | 5–9 |
| Myles Turner | 14 | 4 | 1 | 6–11 |
| Bobby Portis | 6 | 7 | 1 | 3–8 |
| Jericho Sims | 4 | 7 | 2 | 2–3 |
| AJ Green | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1–6 |
| Kyle Kuzma | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1–3 |
Rollins’ wider line was mixed. He shot six of 17 overall and committed five turnovers, so his outside accuracy came alongside less efficient possessions elsewhere.
Cam Thomas gave the bench a scoring lift with 15 points on five-of-nine shooting. Myles Turner contributed 14 points and two blocks.
Milwaukee needed more from the remaining starters, however. Green and Kuzma combined for six points. With Toronto finding several scoring options, that limited output left a considerable gap for the guards to cover.
Bobby Portis and Jericho Sims each collected seven rebounds, but Milwaukee could not turn its work on the boards into enough sustained scoring.
Shooting and Turnovers Explain the Biggest Differences
The Milwaukee Bucks vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats tell a clearer story when individual totals are placed beside the team figures.
Toronto shot 46.8% from the field, compared with Milwaukee’s 41.2%. The difference was more damaging from three-point range, where the Raptors made 16 shots and the Bucks made nine.
Those seven extra three-pointers produced a 21-point scoring advantage. Toronto attempted more outside shots and converted them at a better rate, finishing at 34.8% against Milwaukee’s 28.1%.
Passing also separated the teams. The Raptors recorded 34 assists, while the Bucks finished with 18. Toronto’s total suggests that creating baskets was shared more widely across the line-up.
Then came the turnovers. Milwaukee finished with 19, compared with Toronto’s eight. The Raptors scored 27 points from those mistakes; Milwaukee managed eight points from Toronto’s turnovers.
The turnover battle and shooting advantage should be read together. Giving away possession means losing a chance to score, while potentially handing the opposition another opportunity. Milwaukee could hardly afford that pattern while already trailing.
Rebounding was much closer. The Bucks collected 46 player rebounds to Toronto’s 45, yet the Raptors led 21–11 in second-chance points.
The lesson is straightforward: the value of a rebound depends partly on what happens next. Toronto made more of its extra chances.
Bench Contributions Made Toronto’s Lead Easier to Protect
Quickley was the headline performer, but Toronto’s reserves supplied a substantial part of the result.
The Raptors’ bench scored 46 points, compared with Milwaukee’s 32. Mamukelashvili and Shead accounted for 27 of Toronto’s reserve points between them.
Collin Murray-Boyles added eight points, four rebounds and two steals. Jamison Battle scored five points without missing either of his two field-goal attempts.
These contributions gave Toronto useful scoring beyond its leading starters. For Milwaukee, Thomas provided the strongest bench response, but the overall reserve output fell short.
Shead’s all-round performance was particularly valuable. Six assists without a turnover gave Toronto another player who could create opportunities while protecting possession.
There is a wider point here about reading basketball statistics. A leading scorer can attract most of the attention, yet the game may become decisive when substitutes enter and maintain the standard.
Toronto had that support. Milwaukee had several worthwhile individual efforts, but they did not combine into the same level of team production.
Conclusion
The Milwaukee Bucks vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats show why Toronto’s early deficit proved temporary. Quickley supplied the standout scoring, Ingram added another reliable attacking option, and the bench gave the visitors valuable support.
Milwaukee had positives in Porter’s double-double and Rollins’ 21 points, but turnovers and uneven scoring made the task harder as the game progressed. Once Toronto took control, it kept finding contributions across the line-up, and Milwaukee ran out of answers.
Also read: Research Dossier for Target Company: The Questions Worth Asking Before You Commit
(FAQs)
Who won the Bucks vs Raptors game on 22 February 2026?
The Toronto Raptors defeated the Milwaukee Bucks 122–94 at Fiserv Forum, winning by 28 points.
How many points did Immanuel Quickley score?
Quickley scored 32 points. He also recorded nine assists, three rebounds and five made three-pointers.
Which Milwaukee players scored the most points?
Ryan Rollins and Kevin Porter Jr. scored 21 points each. Porter also supplied ten assists, while Rollins collected nine rebounds.
Why did Giannis Antetokounmpo miss the game?
Antetokounmpo was listed out with a right calf strain. Toronto also played without Scottie Barnes, who was absent for personal reasons.
What were the main reasons for Toronto’s victory?
Toronto shot better, made more three-pointers, committed fewer turnovers and received more bench scoring. Its response to Milwaukee’s third-quarter comeback attempt was another important turning point.
