Seattle reached the Super Bowl, but Los Angeles made the Seahawks work for every inch. Their NFC Championship meeting at Lumen Field on 25 January 2026 ended 31–27, with two outstanding quarterback performances and a final quarter filled with missed opportunities.
The Los Angeles Rams vs Seahawks Match Player Stats show how narrow the difference was. Matthew Stafford threw for 374 yards and three touchdowns, while Sam Darnold answered with 346 yards and three scores. Neither quarterback threw an interception. Puka Nacua and Jaxon Smith-Njigba led their receiving groups, repeatedly finding space in a game packed with attacking quality.
Yet passing yards alone could not settle this contest. A costly punt mistake, Seattle’s third-down efficiency and a late defensive stand helped decide which team would keep its championship hopes alive.
Match Overview: Seattle Survive Despite the Rams’ Yardage Advantage
Los Angeles finished with 479 total net yards, compared with Seattle’s 396. The Rams also gained 114 rushing yards against the Seahawks’ 75. On those figures alone, the visitors appeared to have done enough to win.
However, Seattle made more of several important situations. The Seahawks converted seven of their 13 third-down attempts, while the Rams managed only one from eight. That gap helped Seattle extend possessions and made Los Angeles depend more heavily on explosive plays.
The scoring pattern added to the tension. Seattle led 10–3 after the opening quarter, but Los Angeles moved ahead during the second. A late Seahawks touchdown restored the home side’s advantage, giving Seattle a 17–13 half-time lead.
Both teams then scored 14 points in the third quarter. Neither scored in the fourth, leaving the game balanced on the same four-point margin throughout the closing period.
That scoreless finish matters when reading the box score. This was an attacking contest for much of the evening, but the result ultimately depended on which defence could deliver a stop when a touchdown would change everything.
Passing Stats: Stafford’s Yardage Meets Darnold’s Efficiency
The quarterback comparison sits at the centre of the Los Angeles Rams vs Seahawks Match Player Stats. Stafford produced more passing yards, but Darnold completed a higher percentage of his throws and finished with a slightly better passer rating.
| Quarterback | Team | Completions/Attempts | Passing yards | Touchdowns | Interceptions | Passer rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | Rams | 22/35 | 374 | 3 | 0 | 127.6 |
| Sam Darnold | Seahawks | 25/36 | 346 | 3 | 0 | 127.8 |
Passing figures: official team box score and Seahawks statistical review.
Stafford averaged approximately 10.7 yards per attempt. His ability to connect downfield meant the Rams could recover ground quickly, even when their drives lacked consistent third-down success.
His touchdown passes went to Kyren Williams, Davante Adams and Nacua. Those different targets gave the Rams several routes into the end zone rather than placing the entire scoring burden on one receiver.
Darnold completed approximately 69.4% of his attempts, compared with Stafford’s 62.9%. His performance combined substantial yardage with accurate distribution, allowing Seattle to threaten through both its leading receiver and supporting options.
Smith-Njigba, Jake Bobo and Cooper Kupp caught Darnold’s touchdown passes. Seattle also finished without a turnover, an important advantage in a game where one lost possession could carry enormous weight.
There was little separating the quarterbacks statistically. Stafford supplied the greater yardage total; Darnold’s production helped Seattle turn enough possessions into points to protect its lead.
Receiving Stats: Nacua and Smith-Njigba Lead the Show
The leading receivers gave both quarterbacks dependable targets throughout the contest. Nacua finished with the highest receiving yardage, while Smith-Njigba caught the most passes.
| Player | Team | Receptions | Receiving yards | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puka Nacua | Rams | 9 | 165 | 1 |
| Davante Adams | Rams | 4 | 89 | 1 |
| Colby Parkinson | Rams | 3 | 62 | 0 |
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | Seahawks | 10 | 153 | 1 |
| Rashid Shaheed | Seahawks | 1 | 51 | 0 |
| Kenneth Walker III | Seahawks | 4 | 49 | 0 |
| Cooper Kupp | Seahawks | 4 | 36 | 1 |
| Jake Bobo | Seahawks | 1 | 17 | 1 |
Selected receiving figures from the official Rams–Seahawks box score.
Nacua averaged around 18.3 yards per reception. His production gave Los Angeles a way to move large distances without needing a long sequence of successful plays.
Adams added another threat, while Parkinson’s contribution showed the value of involving the tight end. Together, those three players accounted for 316 of Stafford’s 374 passing yards.
For Seattle, Smith-Njigba was the main target, but the supporting catches carried considerable importance. Shaheed turned his only reception into a 51-yard gain, illustrating how a single touch can influence field position.
Bobo’s contribution was even more direct: one catch, one touchdown. Kupp also reached the end zone despite finishing well behind the leading receivers in yardage. Those performances underline why receiving totals need context. The biggest statistical line and the most valuable individual catch are not always the same thing.
Rushing Stats: Walker’s Contribution Went Beyond Carries
The rushing figures within the Los Angeles Rams vs Seahawks Match Player Stats show contrasting approaches. Los Angeles gained more ground overall, while Seattle leaned heavily on Kenneth Walker III.
| Player | Team | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | Rushing touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake Corum | Rams | 9 | 55 | 6.1 | 0 |
| Kyren Williams | Rams | 10 | 39 | 3.9 | 0 |
| Matthew Stafford | Rams | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Kenneth Walker III | Seahawks | 19 | 62 | 3.3 | 1 |
| Sam Darnold | Seahawks | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 |
| George Holani | Seahawks | 3 | 4 | 1.3 | 0 |
Selected rushing figures from the official team box score.
Corum offered the strongest average among the regularly used running backs. His 55 yards from nine attempts gave the Rams an effective alternative to throwing and showed that their running game could create worthwhile gains.
Williams had a quieter rushing return, although his receiving touchdown added value beyond his carries. Judging his performance only by rushing yards would therefore leave out a scoring contribution.
Walker’s 3.3-yard rushing average was modest, but his overall involvement was substantial. Adding 49 receiving yards to his 62 on the ground gave him 111 yards from scrimmage. He also scored Seattle’s opening touchdown on a two-yard run.
His performance demonstrates the importance of looking at a running back’s complete workload. Carries, catches and scoring opportunities all contributed to Seattle’s attacking balance.
Defence and Special Teams: The Plays That Changed the Result
The Rams recorded three sacks, with Braden Fiske, Jared Verse and Kamren Kinchens collecting one each. Seattle’s DeMarcus Lawrence registered his team’s only sack. Neither defence intercepted a pass.
Those numbers show that Los Angeles created more sacks, but pressure alone did not determine the outcome. Seattle still found enough passing success to build and rebuild its advantage.
One of the clearest turning points came early in the third quarter. Rams returner Xavier Smith muffed a punt, and Dareke Young recovered for Seattle at the Los Angeles 17-yard line. Darnold found Bobo for a touchdown on the next play, extending the lead to 24–13.
It was a sharp reversal. The Rams’ defence had forced a punt, apparently earning another opportunity for Stafford. Instead, Seattle received a short field and immediately converted it into seven points.
Los Angeles kept fighting and later reached the Seattle six-yard line during the fourth quarter. However, Stafford’s fourth-down pass fell incomplete, ending a major opportunity to take the lead.
Seattle then used much of the remaining time. The Rams eventually regained possession at their own seven-yard line with just 25 seconds left and no timeouts. Their final attempt ran out of time.
That closing sequence explains the result more clearly than yardage alone: Seattle survived the dangerous possession, then left its opponent with very little room to respond.
Conclusion
The Los Angeles Rams vs Seahawks Match Player Stats capture a championship game with outstanding passing, productive receivers and very little separation between the teams. Stafford and Nacua delivered the biggest yardage totals, while Darnold, Smith-Njigba and Walker supplied Seattle with enough attacking production to stay ahead.
The decisive difference came in a handful of situations. Seattle made more third-down opportunities count, took advantage of a special-teams mistake and protected its end zone late. In a four-point game, those moments carried the weight of a championship.
Also read: Timberwolves vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats: Castle Leads a 139–109 Playoff Win
(FAQs)
Who won the Rams vs Seahawks NFC Championship Game?
Seattle won 31–27 at Lumen Field on 25 January 2026, securing a place in the Super Bowl.
Who had more passing yards, Stafford or Darnold?
Matthew Stafford led with 374 passing yards. Sam Darnold finished with 346. Both threw three touchdown passes without an interception.
Who was the leading receiver?
Puka Nacua led all players with 165 receiving yards. Seattle’s Jaxon Smith-Njigba followed with 153 yards and led the game with 10 receptions.
How many touchdowns did Kenneth Walker III score?
Walker scored one rushing touchdown. He also contributed 111 total yards from scrimmage through his rushing and receiving work.
Why did Seattle win despite gaining fewer yards?
Seattle converted more third downs, avoided turnovers and capitalised on a muffed punt. Its late defensive stop also prevented the Rams from scoring a potential go-ahead touchdown.
